Some optimizations are easier in Go than in Emacs Lisp, hence the potential quality of produced bytecode can be higher. For big packages that can be implemented in Go naturally (nearly without pain), this can be an advantage.
I found some optimizations that are not implemented inside Emacs lapcode optimizer.
If I will port them to byte-opt everyone win, right (if they pass Emacs team review, of course)?
I found some optimizations that are not implemented inside Emacs lapcode optimizer. If I will port them to byte-opt everyone win, right (if they pass Emacs team review, of course)?