Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Because Icaza managed to make Qt, and thus KDE, look bad over a licensing shit storm.

It is sadly really how much of Linux DE decisions have been made on political grounds.




Are you advocating that software such as Qt version 1 as of 1998 that is neither available under a license that meets the FSF's Free Software criteria nor the OSI's Open Source criteria nor Debian's DFSG should be a core part of the GNU/Linux desktop?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: