> and isn't just a new name for what competent teams were always doing anyway
That's interesting. I see that the opposite way: weren't competent ops teams already doing the things you listed in #2? Does keeping up with new developments in operations tooling need a new name? Shouldn't that just be part of doing ops well?
That's interesting. I see that the opposite way: weren't competent ops teams already doing the things you listed in #2? Does keeping up with new developments in operations tooling need a new name? Shouldn't that just be part of doing ops well?