You're just making up scenarios that fit your point of view, without arguing that these correspond to the actual options.
Are you arguing that there cannot be any distinction between determinism and non-determinism?
[In reply to the content below:
The scenarios are ones involving a god choosing and performing actions, and the supposed randomness of their dice. What are they meant to translate to?
> I'm arguing that your "deterministic randomness" is indistinguishable from "nondeterministic randomness". You're trying to define a class of "randomness" to be "deterministic but unknown
> You're just making up scenarios that fit your point of view, without arguing that these correspond to the actual options.
No, I gave scenarios that demonstrate why your distinction is not meaningful. If you have a scenario that changes this, can you please explain it?
> Are you arguing that there cannot be any distinction between determinism and non-determinism?
No, I'm arguing that your "deterministic randomness" is indistinguishable from "nondeterministic randomness". You're trying to define a class of "randomness" to be "deterministic but unknown". Near as I can tell, this is a distinction without a difference.
Are you arguing that there cannot be any distinction between determinism and non-determinism?
[In reply to the content below:
The scenarios are ones involving a god choosing and performing actions, and the supposed randomness of their dice. What are they meant to translate to?
> I'm arguing that your "deterministic randomness" is indistinguishable from "nondeterministic randomness". You're trying to define a class of "randomness" to be "deterministic but unknown
No I'm not. Show me where I'm saying that.