Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Do you truly think a nuclear physicist with five patents on his name and a thousand citations is N times more productive than the farmer that provides this physicist with food?

I too am someone who does work that helps us improve in the long run, I don't put the literal bread on anyone's table. (I hope that saying translates from Dutch.) So I don't identify as someone doing the hard work while scientists do "the important work", but I do think everyone's work is important. In terms of wages, I have trouble with the idea of farmers that earn less than me while working more hours and taking more risks in terms of job security and physical safety, but there's little I can do at the moment.

To make sure you get what I'm referring to, this is what I'm talking about:

> The world’s ten largest urban economic regions hold only 6.5% of the world’s population, but account for 57% of patented innovations, 53% of the most cited scientists and 43% of economic output. That means the people in these regions are about eight times more productive than the average person.

More productive on some narrow measure. What a snobby statement.




He's referring to this concept from economics: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Productivity.


First line of the article:

> Productivity describes various measures of the efficiency of production.

I don't see how that is specific to patents and citations per capita.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: