Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

What's wrong with the reasoning, then? Isn't the probability amplitude proportional to the area?



It's proportional to the area, which is already a term encompassing length^2.


If the probability amplitude is proportional to the area, it doesn't matter if that term already encompasses a length² term. QM tells you then that the probability should be proportional to the square of that amplitude, even if that means it would encompass a length^4 term.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: