Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This isn't a "spread." This is Uber charging the passenger one fare and paying the driver as if the passenger paid a smaller fare, without telling the driver or the rider that it is doing that. It's more like a broker quoting two different spreads to either end of a transaction and skimming off the top.



But see above. What I pay the driver has no direct relationship to what I charge the rider (or vice versa). The financial metaphor breaks down here.

They correlate, sure: both formulas include miles and time (or estimates thereof). But they're not bound nor guaranteed to move in lockstep.

That drivers (or riders) thought they did is not a legal argument. (Unless they were led to believe false information by Uber itself.)


That drivers thought they did is a legal argument if a reasonable person would think that.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: