Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The minus the Uber Fee sprinkled all over that page makes it marketing.



Of course it's marketing. The website is obviously not a legally binding contract. The point is that it's not in any way described as being an fixed percentage of what the passenger pays. That's just not the payment mechanism at all. Of course, the devil is in the details, but it would really surprise me if Uber's contract had a completely different compensation model than the website.


The company that routinely breaks laws as their business model? It would surprise you if they broke another law?


No, it wouldn't surprise me that they broke the law. I'm still going to request some actual evidence though.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: