Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I played with the anxiety & depression example, but I didn't get it. Specifically, I don't understand how "doing things" leads to "feeling good" which leads to "depression".



Every minus sign inverts the direction of the change. Every plus sign leaves the direction of the change as it is. More doing things leads (+) to more feeling good, which leads (-) to less depression, which leads (-) to less de-motivation. But more de-motivation leads (+) to more depression, which leads (-) to less feeling good, which leads (-) to more depression.


A fair number of systems created here haven't grokked the behavior of (-), leading to models that don't actually behave as intended. I admit, it took me a few tries to notice, myself. The description given for relationships doesn't help, suggesting that (-) does nothing more than changing ๐Ÿกฉ to ๐Ÿกซ. Having three options, more (๐Ÿกฉ), less (๐Ÿกซ), and flip (โ†•) would have been clearer and more versatile.


Doing things has a positive (+) impact on feeling good, which has a negative (-) impact on depression. The sign there is important.


Doing things only has a positive impact if the outcome is at least positive.


I can't find a good solution for the problem and that's a bit depressing... This feels a bit more accurate to me though: http://bit.ly/2nsIOXc




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: