I think you miss the point. The article proposes a path for distillers whose target audience is researchers, not the lay public.
Science journalists are fairly poor distillers of knowledge, actually.
What's needed is more like a way for senior researchers to write more and better review papers that lay out and summarize all of the issues around a particular sub-field, for active researchers in that field.
Science journalists are fairly poor distillers of knowledge, actually.
What's needed is more like a way for senior researchers to write more and better review papers that lay out and summarize all of the issues around a particular sub-field, for active researchers in that field.