I didn't make the argument that California should or should not fund anyone over anyone else. That is up to the (good) people of California.
You seemed to indicate the California could have chosen to spend its money in a different manner. You started off by pointing out "Money [is] fungible". I was just pointing out the logical conclusion of that argument.
I didn't make the argument that California should or should not fund anyone over anyone else. That is up to the (good) people of California.
You seemed to indicate the California could have chosen to spend its money in a different manner. You started off by pointing out "Money [is] fungible". I was just pointing out the logical conclusion of that argument.