Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

No? Because that complaint doesn't make any sense? Especially since Terminal.app is far more modern than CMD.EXE?



> Especially since Terminal.app is far more modern than CMD.EXE?

To be fair, a lot of Terminal.app dates back to ancient Mac OS too. The menu bars, for example, are all still Carbon. There is still a full classic Mac OS main loop running alongside the Cocoa main loop in every macOS application. Apple's done a good job hiding it, but it's still there.

Anyway, cmd.exe is a bit of a special case. What you're really seeing is conhost.exe, which is kept the way it is because it's part of CSRSS, which occupies a similar place as PID 1 does, and Microsoft doesn't want to bring new UI into it for fear of increasing its dependencies [1].

[1]: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20071231-00/?p=...


It does makes sense if I insist we only consider my own personal subjective opinion on the matter, which most complaints along these lines tend to be.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: