Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This feels like hysterical paranoid fear mongering to me. I see you in your room with pictures of Russia and Putin and Tillerson and Trump pinned to the wall and string linking them this way and that.

Like, concretely, what's your hypothesis? I don't actually see you trying to say anything, but rather just sort of cast doubt and aspersions without thinking through what it means.

Tillerson was the CEO of ExxonMobil. Of course the guy in charge of one of the world's largest oil and gas companies is going to interact amicably with the guy in charge of one of the world's largest oil and gas producing countries. And of course, given his experience and perspective, sanctions cause a lot of problems in business. What exactly are you trying to say about him here? That he's a Russian spy?

Flynn is a retired 3 star general. He recently resigned for lying to Pence, sure, but no one is really making the argument that he did anything fundamentally wrong. He broke protocol by letting another country know that these new sanctions may be reversed in a matter of weeks by the upcoming administration that he's a part of. I've yet to see a lawyer make an argument that that's really against the spirit of the Logan Act, but I'd love to hear that perspective if you've seen one. But again, what are you trying to say about him here? That a 3 star general is a Russian spy?

> Combined with a very narrow focus on removing sanctions (without any talk about the violations of sovereignty of Crimea/Ukraine)

Sure, I understand your political viewpoint here, but it's just that. People are free to differ on what they think of Russia's annexation of Crimea, and the U.S. response to it.

> plenty of troubling links

Again, troubling HOW? Give me a hypothesis here. I honestly don't understand a coherent world view beneath your fear. Yes, the incoming administration is more pro-Russia than Clinton would have been. And yes, the annexation of Crimea is not automatically a deal breaker to working with them. But so what? Are you actually implying that this is all a coup and that Russia is pulling the strings of the U.S. government right now? That they've compromised a boorish, stupid billionaire, the CEO of Exxon Mobil, generals in the military, and so forth?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: