"So it's better when the media is inaccurate or incorrect?" Where did this come from? I absolutely do not support inaccuracy by the media, nor did I suggest that I did. I do recognize that most all publications and writers exhibit bias, which is why it is important to get information representing multiple points of view.
Considering you likely have little or no access to most primary sources of information, like everyone else, I don't see how you have any choice other than to rely on their coverage combined with your own critical thinking and research.
Also considering that an incredible number of Donald Trump's statements are easily verifiably false, I don't see how he could be considered a primary source of anything other than his own words.
As far as "The recent Felix Kjellberg incident", What exactly do you mean? Some publications condemning his actions while others rush to his defense?
Considering you likely have little or no access to most primary sources of information, like everyone else, I don't see how you have any choice other than to rely on their coverage combined with your own critical thinking and research.
Also considering that an incredible number of Donald Trump's statements are easily verifiably false, I don't see how he could be considered a primary source of anything other than his own words.
As far as "The recent Felix Kjellberg incident", What exactly do you mean? Some publications condemning his actions while others rush to his defense?