Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Meanwhile, the elected President and his party are demanding the names of people involved in climatology and are passing acts to let them reduce individual named government employees' salaries to $1 per year.

Avoiding that "corruption" really did a whole lot of good with the actual, literal wannabe serial-assaulting autocrat who is in office, you're so very right.




Can you provide reputable sources for those claims?


Energy Dept. rejects Trump’s request to name climate-change workers, who remain worried:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/12/13/...

House Republicans revive obscure rule that allows them to slash the pay of individual federal workers to $1:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/house...

Both have been extensively reported and are well-understood. In the interest of fairness that Trump and his cronies do not deserve, they claimed significantly after-the-fact that the former request for the names climate workers was "not authorized." This is a lie, and a bad one, and the truly damning thing is that they think--perhaps even correctly--that the lie will be taken by their listeners. "Alternative facts" (hat-tip to Trump's mouthpiece Conway for that gem) are the measure of the autocrat: make the people doubt everything to exhaust them, to instill the notion that there is no truth, and to prevent them from focusing on what you are actually doing. It provides cover when suspicions are actually aroused by something you are doing to fade away, and then it is as if it never was.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: