So they found that the group which sat for 10 hours but did 30 mins of exercise had cells just as robust as the group which ... what, sat around for 2 hours?
Where are the details?
Don't be fooled. Other studies showed that exercise doesn't negate the damage done by sitting:
The study linked was about elderly women specifically.
It actually sounds pretty obvious when you state it like "the subjects that were more active were more healthy" -- we already know that should be the case generally.
What's a good movement cycle? Both time and activity?
My watch reminds me to move to try and get 250 steps an hour, so hourly I try to get up and get some steps. However that's not an increased heart rate and etc.
Sure, i just meant it's not what i thought was a "meaningful" increase. Ie, i'd like to at least try and offset the damage i'm doing by sitting all day. So i'm wondering if some basic movement every hour will offset that? Or do i really need to get my heart pumping? etc.
Where are the details?
Don't be fooled. Other studies showed that exercise doesn't negate the damage done by sitting:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2015/01/21/heal...
http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/adult-health/exp...
Get off your butt, especially if you work on a computer. Take breaks to alternate between mental and physical activity.