Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Millions of people have died because the government has banned certain drugs. Whereas the number of people who have died because of a drug not being banned is zero. It seems like a clear tradeoff to me.



> Whereas the number of people who have died because of a drug not being banned is zero.

I'm sure this is a debatable 'fact'/statistic.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fen-phen had a body count before it was banned. Such cases are rare, but that means the system is doing at least part of its job.


People died because they took a dangerous drug. They didn't die because the drug wasn't illegal.

If you want to cut down the number of people taking dangerous drugs, ban doctors from prescribing non FDA-approved drugs and ban companies from marketing them. However, I have only contempt for people who want to put their fellow citizens in jail for making their own medical decisions.


"guns don't kill people, the pauli exclusion principle kills people"





Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: