Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Clearly they cherry picked the tests

What's the point in creating new test to cover things that existing tests already cover?




What's the point in a summary that ignores literally hundreds of tests? Tests that, as you point out, already exist and so would require absolutely no effort to run.

Why have a row in the table that says SVG IE 100% when the truth is very different:

http://www.codedread.com/svg-support.php

The Google plugin that transforms SVG to Flash passes twice as many tests as the IE9 preview. Opera passes 3 (nearly 4) times as many, yet Microsoft felt it was useful to list a random subset of tests that show them doing well.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: