The explanation completely went over your head. The numbers weren't from measurements of actual firm performance, they were demonstrative examples to explain why measuring the median isn't very useful in this case.
And no, my example was 6 firms with the median having -1% growth rate, for the record.
However you can observe that if you invested $100 ($600 total) into each firm, you would end up with $636.
Median return isn't a very useful measure of the health of a sector. It is a predictor for risk, but not a very good one.