I am also not medically trained, but I was present during my wife's two childbirths. I am strongly opposed to described method and would not advice anyone, let alone my wife, to undergo such treatment. Why ? Because delivering a child is a process, during which many things may go wrong and there's a number of possible complications. Baby is stressed, mother is stressed, no one knows in advance, what can go wrong. The staff needs time to react and help the baby (and possibly mother) if needed. I can't see them helping anyone with a machine spinning so fast that centrifugal force ejects a baby. Actually, I can't even imagine the force needed for that, would probably kill the baby and mother.
I voted you up because my son, born six months ago, underwent periodic slowdowns in heart rate because the umbilical chord was wrapped around his neck.
And I know absolutely nothing about air pressure, but it does seem like it'd be a lot to fight against. Given that an average baby's head has about 97 square inches (cross-section), and 1 atmosphere is about 14.7 PSI, it must take almost 1433 pounds of force to eject a baby! Given a baby's average weight of 7.5 pounds, that means you'd have to spin at 191 Gs just to overcome air pressure; you've still got to fight friction!
I'm sorry, but this just made me literally laugh out loud:
"The mother is then spun around and around at a speed the gynecologist has predetermined will be sufficient to dislodge the infant (or as the patent states, "the fetus"). The apparent maximum g-force for the machine is 7."
