Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

No. Without their culture, community, and absolute freedom to roam the planet and carve a corner for themselves, they would be another zoo/museum curiosity, a biological anomaly paraded before us for pennies.

Even if a sizable population of them were granted full human rights and a habitat, they would forever owe us their existence, and their debt to humans would hang over anything they achieve for themselves in terms of growth and survival. Our future generations will also treat them as an experiment gone awry, should they ever threaten the slightest human interest.

It's hard enough watching dying racial and linguistic minority groups; their last remaining few members made into coursework for "our" undergraduates.

Bringing back a Neanderthal is to kill him twice, after granting him a brief purposeless life for our own edutainment. Let them rest in peace.




If you cloned a Neanderthal, you would get a relatively normal looking person with average human intelligence who would adopt whatever language and culture they grew up in. Their differences due to being a Neanderthal would be more subtle than the variation among individual human beings. They would likely lead a normal life, provided they could escape the inevitable media frenzy and racism.

The question "should we clone a Neanderthal?" is the same as the question "should we use unreliable technology to radically alter the development of a human being just for research purposes?" in which case the answer is undeniably "No".


In his BBC series "British Isles: A Natural History" Alan Titchmarsh was made up to look like a Neanderthal, put on normal clothes and then went for a walk down a busy street - hardly anyone noticed. You can see a picture of him on this page:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A21606040

An excellent series: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/britishisles/prog...


I think there is a big difference between trying to restart their civilisation and cloning one. Sure morally it would probably be the wrong thing to do, but there would be a lot to learn from doing it.

I guess it's a fine moral line, if they're considered humans then people probably be against it but the past has shown animals are another class altogether with cloning research.


> Without their culture, community, and absolute freedom to roam the planet and carve a corner for themselves, they would be another zoo/museum curiosity, a biological anomaly paraded before us for pennies.

By this argument, we should destroy all zoos and let the species in them die off. It's counter to all biological knowledge.

> Even if a sizable population of them were granted full human rights and a habitat, they would forever owe us their existence, and their debt to humans would hang over anything they achieve for themselves in terms of growth and survival.

So? How is that different from the debt you owe your parents?

> Our future generations will also treat them as an experiment gone awry, should they ever threaten the slightest human interest.

This happens to minority ethnic groups all the time. Look at the new Arizona immigration law.

> It's hard enough watching dying racial and linguistic minority groups; their last remaining few members made into coursework for "our" undergraduates.

So... trying to understand ourselves is morally wrong? It's horrible to preserve our dying ways as best we know how?

> Bringing back a Neanderthal is to kill him twice, after granting him a brief purposeless life for our own edutainment. Let them rest in peace.

This applies equally to the California condor and the panda. We should just let all endangered species rest in peace, I suppose.


Your whole arguments falls apart when you realize I was addressing Neanderthals as our closest cousin, and not just any other animals.

Once you realize that the caged animal has more in common with you than any other specie, you start to put yourself in his place.


> Once you realize that the caged animal has more in common with you than any other specie, you start to put yourself in his place.

The same applies to chimps, and then recursively down the chain from other apes all the way to bacteria.


>Bringing back a Neanderthal is to kill him twice, after granting him a brief purposeless life for our own edutainment.

They wouldn't all have to play in the NFL would they?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: