Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Microsoft was supposed to be the evil one. But you guys are busting down doors in Palo Alto while Commandant Gates is ridding the world of mosquitoes! What the fuck is going on?! It's all mixed up!

At least Apple doesn't charge you $80 to change your desktop background on a netbook. But otherwise, I agree.

Apple is hurting the field -- locking down hardware, mandating woefully outdated legacy programming languages, and specifically crippling their hardware and software. Microsoft, on the other hand, is not nearly so bad. At least they are trying to push F# on the world, which I see as a good thing.




1. Apple doesn't make a netbook

2. The cheapest Laptop Apple sells costs $999. The iPad costs $499. Where as the most popular netbook on amazon.com costs $362 (Asus EeePC 1005PE). This is certainly more than the $80 difference Microsoft charge.


What do you mean by the $80 to change the background bit? (I'm not disagreeing, I genuinely don't know what you're referring to.)


Windows 7 Starter does not have the ability to change the desktop background. You have to upgrade to "Windows 7 Home Super Awesome OMG" or whatever to get that.


At least Apple doesn't charge you $80 to change your desktop background on a netbook

On the other hand, they do charge you $99 an year for the privilege of putting code you wrote on a device you own.


What about an Xbox 360?

According to this page it is $99 a year to be able to distribute Xbox Live Community games:

http://creators.xna.com/en-US/XboxLIVECommunityGames


True. Moral of the story: Big Companies like to give the shaft to consumers.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: