Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

So explain Sam's Club (Walmart's version of Costco). They have the exact same business model as Costco, but pay their employees Walmart wages.



Sam's Club has lower profit margins than Costco [1] and roughly 50% more SKUs [2]. Both of which would push labor productivity lower.

[1] "Walmart figures include Sam's Club, which despite having more stores, is much less profitable than Costco."

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2013-08-27/why-walma...

[2] See the graph

https://www.kriq.com/ContentIndex/ArticleDetails.aspx?key=Bl...


The number of SKUs is irrelevant. The number of employees are what matter if we're talking about salaries. Having more SKUs doesn't push labor productivity lower, having more SKUs WITH more employees would push labor productivity lower. If they're doing it with the same or fewer employees it would be the exact opposite.

As for the stores being less profitable, I would imagine it's a self-fulfilling prophecy. They pay the vast majority of their employees welfare-inducing wages which is an instant turnoff to anyone in the middle class who actually cares about companies taking care of their employees.


Not sure how this fits in, but my two stints at Costco each had high layoff and rehire rates. Getting the "full time Costco " job was desired but hard. I never knew how or why so many came back after post Christmas layoff and could survive.

I do not believe from my Wally experience I ever hear of "temporary" hires that really get termed. If you are doing the job well you stay if you want


That's been my experience in almost every job I've worked, from McDonald's to Big Telecom. If you impress people they'll bend whatever rules they have to bend to make sure you stay.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: