Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Meta question: what do you consider spammy about this blog post? It seems like a perfectly fine, digestible narrative of the product without requiring the reader to sift through a product page.

On a more related note, I find it interesting that the product page says there's a 4 year warranty on the camera body. I didn't see anything about the warranty on the mod itself.




I agree, the blog post is a much better quality post. Also, I would imagine a direct link to a product page would turn a lot of people off.


Oh, looks like the OP link was updated since I posted that. The original link was to Gizmodo: https://gizmodo.com/this-upgraded-nikon-chills-the-sensor-fo...

I should have linked to the original Petapixel post on the bottom of that Gizmodo page. My bad.


Petapixel is half blogspam anyways, a tiny step up from Gizmodo. It was actually banned from r/photography for spam reasons.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: