Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I followed exactly the same line of reasoning except that I did swerve to save people crossing on a green light at the expense of people on a red light. The reasoning being something like: "The passenger of the car should absorb the risk of a car failure, not pedestrians. In the case pedestrians must die, protect those who follow the rules if possible."

Incidentally my answers meant I always killed women instead of men...




I wonder if the test is adaptive, did it hone-in to differentiate preferences or present the same scenario set to everyone?

It felt like it was honing in on my preference at the end, but I'm not sure.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: