Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Rats consume a sizeable percentage of rice production. From an earlier story [1]:

  The next call came from Australia in 2006. Biologists there
  wanted an adaptation of Mouseopause for rats. Rats, they told 
  her, were eating 30% of the rice crop in Australia and 
  Indonesia. If she could reduce the rat population by even half, 
  they claimed, the crops that would be saved could feed millions 
  of people.
[1] Man v rat: could the long war soon be over? (theguardian.com), https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12542718

Agricultural output is always variable. The world needs more storage capacity [2], and to better support small farmers. There's the ancient parable about "seven years of abundance" preceding "seven years of famine". Only "old" grain should be fed to animals.

For the most part, genetic engineering has been used to sell pesticides. While this C3->C4 innovation might not be as harmful as Monsanto's, it would be better to deal with our other agricultural problems too. Getting rats' numbers under control, and other low-tech investments (such as was undertaken in Thailand starting in the 1960's [3]), would be just as effective as throwing new seeds at farmers...

Haiti demonstrates that politics is the most important factor for determining agricultural output. [4]

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grain_silo [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice_production_in_Thailand [4] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12531999 - "Why Are Haiti's Coffee Trees So Tall?"




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: