Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's hard for me to understand the issue with this. Google didn't hire the guy who wrote software that had a big impact on the community. Does it mean Google misses good engineers because of their less-than-ideal interview process, or simply Google hires only people who are a good fit for their organisation?

Writing the overly bitter tweet surely won't help with improving hiring points. Seems highly unprofessional and childish.




Well, he's at Apple now in charge of the Swift Package Manager, so I think he did okay.


He left.


Yeah I'm curious why he left. From what I could tell it sounded like changes in Swift took an act of congress basically. Which is fine, and how it should be, given how important it is to get it right. I wonder where he went.


My understanding is he just doesn't really know how to work in a big company.


Meh. I know "how to work in a big company" and choose not to. Talented people will always do whatever they want.


You choose not to, but you could if you wanted to, right? He apparently wanted to, otherwise he wouldn't have gone to Apple in the first place, but he just doesn't know how to work in a corporate environment. In fact, he says as much in this tweet: https://twitter.com/mxcl/status/773574683518119936


You seem to be looking at this through a somewhat unusual prism.

You and I both "know how" to eat discarded food out of a trash dumpster.

But absent some truly compelling reason, we wouldn't choose to do so, right?


Really? I didn't know that. I'm sure he has plenty of options though.


Source?



Thanks!


Looks like Google was onto something when they rejected him to start with...


That's really interesting. I love homebrew – it does exactly what it says on the tin and I've been using it for years at this point without any reason for complaint. User experience is certainly a part of that, it's very seldom I've found myself in a position where I have to resort to searching for support, since brew usually lets you know right in the terminal what went wrong, and how to fix it. It'll be interesting to see if this great user experience translates to the swift pkg manager.


I will just assert that at Googe scale (some 20000-30000 engineers from a quick search), "good fit" isn't really a thing. Now, it doesn't mean they might not be hiring a certain mono-culture type of programmers, but that might not be a "fit" issue (Disclaimer: I do think "good fit" is vaguely defined)

And I'd love to see a counter assertion/argument.


Is it even possible to have a monoculture with 20k–30k engineers?


Does it mean Google misses good engineers because of their less-than-ideal interview process

Google intentionally prefers false negatives to false positives.


They do have false positives. Quite a bit. They just fool themselves into thinking they minimize false positives by their hiring process.


I'm sorry, but I am sick and tired of "unprofessional" just thrown around like this. The person is a god damned human being, not a robot. They had just gone through an extremely frustrating experience with an unsatisfying conclusion. And it's Twitter.

The only one who's being unprofessional is the one chiding others for being "unprofessional".


I've never publicly called out a company that rejected me. It's not that hard to exercise some self-restraint.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: