Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I've heard this criticism a lot and it always perplexes me, because it's completely divorced from the reality of how mobile ads are bought and sold.

Right now the mobile ad market can work with your approximate age, your gender, your location down to the city level at most, and very high-level interests derived from the site or app you happen to be using at the time. Anything else is too finely grained to sell meaningful volumes of advertising against and therefore not wanted.

I'm guessing people take the reality of the online ad market and falsely assume the mobile market is there as well.




I don't care what they're doing with the data today. I'd rather they didn't have it at all. I directly benefit from this decision.


It would be interesting to know how coarse the data exposed to mobile ad providers is -- does anyone have any experience here?

Were I implementing mobile ads, the precise location would stay on the device, and the information sent to the ad server would be city or at least zip level.


Except for the whole classification of apps (Free) that are going to be squeezed by this. By eliminating competition, Apple gets to decide just how profitable (if at all) app companies are going to be.

This isn't good for anyone but Apple.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: