This article ends disappointingly in a series of mental exercises. The "LCD" involved is the 8-shape commonly used in LCDs to allow any digit to be displayed. There is no discussion about how light traversing a liquid crystal display illuminates time's arrow, nor the change undergone when a liquid crystal is electrified.
Sorry, naive question here: how do we know that time's moving forward? If it moves back and forth, wouldn't we, being inside time and our own internal states dictated by the physical state of our own matter, be unable to perceive that differently from time going forward-only?
The question of "time" and what you might call "metatime" are two different ones. "How does time work?" is a legitimately interesting question on its own without considering "metatime", and amenable to at least a certain amount of investigation. "Does time perhaps get scrambled around in ways we can't possibly observe?" is at least academically interesting, but in contrast, not very amenable to investigation. How could we prove that the multiple-world hypothesis is true? How can we prove that the universe does not simply stop five minutes from now? Or ram into what proves to be something else that we intersect in our future? How could we prove whether or not the Great Simulator does or does not roll back the simulation sometimes because It did not like the particular set of results? If there are ways of investigating these questions, they are much less obvious.
I think the 'direction' is the same 'direction' describing the process of say, a non-reversible chemical reaction, like catching something on fire. The reaction happens in one 'direction' only and cannot be reversed. Maybe? Of course, there are some quantum phenomena that do not obey this directionality?
