"Censorship resistant" also means, in practice, that a large amount of your content is awful. Whereas the average person wants something with the sharp edges removed. Facebook's moderators, inconsistent as they are, are genuinely adding value.
There's no way a priori to determine whether I want content without looking at it. At best I can delegate this up to a moderator to look at it for me.
There are entire subcultures of people who make a game of trying to get people to see images they don't want to see. This has been happening since slashdot and goatse.
> There's no way a priori to determine whether I want content without looking at it
This is plain false. HN does it, for example.
> At best I can delegate this up to a moderator to look at it for me
It's an algorithm, not a moderator. Moderators are currently employed for two things: a) censorship, b) influencing opinions. Everything else algorithms do just fine.
