I found the below comment on the 2004 slashdot discussion. IMO this is the best way to handle this - thought it would add value to discussion on HN (edit - formatting):
"1. Immediately(!) purchase the stolen software, using a Mastercard or Visa. The resulting download is evidence, and the purchase itself will be used later. Make every effort to identify who (URL, domain name, contact info, company name, etc.) is actually processing this credit card transaction (hint: it's usually not the kid in Pakistan).
2. Notify the contact info of the domain of the infringement. Use a DMCA-compliant notification.
3. Notify the next upstream ISP of that domain of same.
4. Notify the domain's registrar. Some have TOS which forbid illegal activity.
5. Is the bad guy still up? Then start notifying the credit card processor that they have participated in a sale of stolen goods. Use a letter that calmly documents the date of purchase, how you identified the download as a stolen copy of your software, etc.
6. When your credit card bill arrives, follow the instructions on the back of the bill to contest that purchase. Inform the credit card company of everything that's happened, including dates and times and copies of correspondence
7. Join the ASP [asp-shareware.org]. It's a chance to notify fellow software producers that their software is being ripped off along with yours (and increase the pressure on a particular pirate site). It's also a way of supporting an organization that works to support your right to make a living selling software.
The linchpin in this effort is credit card processing. I don't care if you live on a small island that you rule yourself, if you take Mastercard/Visa transactions, you rely on American companies and American law. These giant companies grant smaller companies the right to parcel out merchant accounts, and they can cause non-trivial financial pain for merchant accounts that generate too many complaints for them.
The wheels of the law can take much time to grind to a conclusion, and not always in your favor. Visa/Mastercard can issue a $20,000 fine in a much shorter time, and they don't have to consult a jury.
In the Wild West of Internet fraud that involves money flow, Mastercard/Visa is judge, jury, and executioner. Most victims simply don't know enough to bring their case to them, or the amount of fraud would be dropping."
http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=134264&cid=1121...
In addition, send a DMCA request to Google. They'll be removed from search results very quickly, and it doesn't matter where in the world they are hosted.
Lots of places do "one shot" credit cards now. Numbers which can be used once, or with a small prepay balance and then discarded. This would seem like an ideal use of that.
Not sure why he's being downvoted. As an avid gamer, I can verify that most foreigners who speak English don't care enough to try to write properly. I'm not bashing, I'm just saying, from my observed experience, that is the case.
For example, I once bought virtual money for an online game called Ragnarok Online. The sellers I interacted with appeared to be from China, and they all spoke pretty much like the guy in the article. These were probably adults, since they had accounts to receive (real-life) money transferred to them. And this is just one example over many years of gaming.
So based on experience, I wouldn't be surprised at all to find that he was in fact at least 20-30 years old.
Does any of this matter? Nope. I'm just trying to work up the motivation to implement a particularly annoying feature, so I'm chilling here talking about randomness. :)
Well I was not referring to a lack of proper English grammar. I was thinking about a specific mindset which could be summarized as: "Everybody's cheating around and I will try my little not-so-smart cheats on you too. That's how everybody behaves so don't tell me it's a problem". And this is (sadly) mid-Asian standard. Especially when you get there physically.
Wow, really? I had no idea that attitude carried over to real life. I mean, I could make the observation that most Asians seemed to behave that way online in a game, but I didn't realize that they mostly behaved like that in real life too.
Is it really because of a different country? Just have a look at trending twitter posts sometime. Some examples from grownups (judging from the pictures) visible right now: "dam why she my biggest fan", "doin' ur 4ends mom", "yur teaachers tryna fcck yu", "u wanna slap da smell outta ppl...? I swear i will slap da #FUNK outta every wet white person in dis f'n class..."
Those were all examples from people who say they're from US. I wasn't even looking for bad examples - they were on one screen. I know there's a difference between weird spelling used by natives and bad grammar from others, but a bad example in one place enables more bad behaviour in another. In some online games I couldn't tell a native English speaker from other people, because they don't care to write properly.
I know what you mean, but I put it down to people new to the internet. They often are bad at typing so take shortcuts like 'u', and they've never written before as much as one does online. Within a year or two there's definite improvement in my experience; practice with touch typing and with composing text.
Country has nothing to do with it IMO, except that the US rarely sees people in their 20s discovering the internet for the first time.
What about getting a default judgment? This could be annoying if the fraudster ever wants to visit the US or work here under an H1-B, etc.
(Don't know if that is possible or not, but if it is, I would be satisfied with that. Google de-lists the site, and the fraudster has an open warrant for credit card fraud if he leaves his home country.)
They should have used the DMCA.
You don't go to the registrar, you go to the host.
You can takedown nearly any site hosted in the USA within a few hours these days (even with content you don't actually own, if you don't mind being counter-noticed or even sued).
so it is...still anyone smart enough to try to fake a response from a host...would at least try to wait a little bit before putting the software back up, after the other person stops looking.
"1. Immediately(!) purchase the stolen software, using a Mastercard or Visa. The resulting download is evidence, and the purchase itself will be used later. Make every effort to identify who (URL, domain name, contact info, company name, etc.) is actually processing this credit card transaction (hint: it's usually not the kid in Pakistan).
2. Notify the contact info of the domain of the infringement. Use a DMCA-compliant notification.
3. Notify the next upstream ISP of that domain of same.
4. Notify the domain's registrar. Some have TOS which forbid illegal activity.
5. Is the bad guy still up? Then start notifying the credit card processor that they have participated in a sale of stolen goods. Use a letter that calmly documents the date of purchase, how you identified the download as a stolen copy of your software, etc.
6. When your credit card bill arrives, follow the instructions on the back of the bill to contest that purchase. Inform the credit card company of everything that's happened, including dates and times and copies of correspondence
7. Join the ASP [asp-shareware.org]. It's a chance to notify fellow software producers that their software is being ripped off along with yours (and increase the pressure on a particular pirate site). It's also a way of supporting an organization that works to support your right to make a living selling software.
The linchpin in this effort is credit card processing. I don't care if you live on a small island that you rule yourself, if you take Mastercard/Visa transactions, you rely on American companies and American law. These giant companies grant smaller companies the right to parcel out merchant accounts, and they can cause non-trivial financial pain for merchant accounts that generate too many complaints for them.
The wheels of the law can take much time to grind to a conclusion, and not always in your favor. Visa/Mastercard can issue a $20,000 fine in a much shorter time, and they don't have to consult a jury.
In the Wild West of Internet fraud that involves money flow, Mastercard/Visa is judge, jury, and executioner. Most victims simply don't know enough to bring their case to them, or the amount of fraud would be dropping." http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=134264&cid=1121...