> It is data related. The patterns exists in the data itself
This is a cop out. You can't get semantics (and grammar) out of "types of words" only (or you couldn't have declensions)
The important thing about recursion is not that it doesn't exist in some places, but the fact that it exists.
The language capabilities of the brain seem to be an "hardware accelerated" heuristic that allows things to be connected more easily
Given that cognitive psychologists can't even reproduce the experiments they're supposedly experts of, I'm not holding my breath from an explanation from them
This is a cop out. You can't get semantics (and grammar) out of "types of words" only (or you couldn't have declensions)
The important thing about recursion is not that it doesn't exist in some places, but the fact that it exists.
The language capabilities of the brain seem to be an "hardware accelerated" heuristic that allows things to be connected more easily
Given that cognitive psychologists can't even reproduce the experiments they're supposedly experts of, I'm not holding my breath from an explanation from them