Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Sounds good to me; I don't see the problem.

If you want to redistribute, then you need to use the old buggy version. I don't really see a problem here.

If you want to use the latest-and-greatest in a non-commercial capacity, you can do just that. And it's open-source, so you can modify it all you want and use it. You just can't distribute it.

What's the problem?

No, it's not as Free as GPLed software, nor is it meant to be. It's meant to allow a company to make a profit on software licensed to other businesses or for commercial use, while still allowing it to be open-source, and allowing private individuals to use it without paying a license fee. (At least, that's how I read it from the article.) It sounds like a great way to balance the competing interests of a commercial software company, the users (both non-commercial and commercial), and the community at large. It would be a terrible license for basic infrastructure software like OpenSSH or PostgreSQL, but for business-oriented application software, it sounds absolutely perfect.

(Note, again, what I've written above about the way the BSL works is what I've gleaned from reading the article; if I'm incorrect, someone please feel free to correct me.)




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: