Bandcamp has been heavily used by many hardcore punk bands for a few years now. The ability to charge a reasonable price for high quality downloads or give them away for free and also sell physical media like records and tapes is a huge deal for lots of punks. There's been several ways of digital distribution of music before Bandcamp, but few of them offered an easy means of getting up and running and monetizing the music in multiple ways (if desired, that you don't have to at all is super important here). It's really the convergence of features rather than any one in particular.
I think for punk bands that might not even be on a label being able to get your music out there without a big upfront investment is more important than artists on larger labels because in that case distribution is usually at least partially handled. That's why the hardcore punk scene has been somewhat of an early adopter of Bandcamp when compared to more mainstream artists.
Also, the band the article mentions in the first paragraph, Mace, is totally worth a listen. Definitely one of my favorite bands coming out of the Midwest right now. If you can get your hands on volume 2 the "No Friends" zine it comes with a flexi that has them and some other great stuff on it.
> Also, the band the article mentions in the first paragraph, Mace, is totally worth a listen. Definitely one of my favorite bands coming out of the Midwest right now. If you can get your hands on volume 2 the "No Friends" zine it comes with a flexi that has them and some other great stuff on it.
Might just be the guitars and the logo, but getting a heavy Urban Blight vibe! Cool stuff
The author is stating that they typically used it for punk, only recently noticing bigger and more mainstream acts are using the service.
As a musician, I can't sing their praises enough. Especially if you aren't particularly huge (<10,000 copies are being sold) and you're part of a community, there is virtually no benefit at all to publishing on itunes/spotify/play.
Is that really the consensus for small artists on Spotify? If I get a band recommendation or stumble across someone (online or happen to see them live) the first place I am going to look for more of their stuff is Spotify.
Sure a small act is going to make no money out of it but I think that they would have more chance of increasing their fan base which will pay for things in the future.
>> Is that really the consensus for small artists on Spotify?
It's not. I don't think there is any consensus with this stuff and there doesn't need to be. You need to do what's best for you. If you can't spend most of the year touring then ignoring streaming and focusing on bandcamp is the way to go. If you want to tour and grow your audience Spotify is essential imo, especially if you're targeting a younger demographic. It's amazing how quickly your music spreads when it hits a playlist (even just a regular users playlist that their friends follow).
