If that is owned by a different person, that brings an interesting opportunity cost problem.
If the owner of the smaller area shared it with the owner of the bigger area. An agreement could be struck to pay for 1 quarter of the operating costs and receive one quarter of the harvest.
Both parties would save on operating costs, yet receive the same harvest.
If the owner of the smaller area shared it with the owner of the bigger area. An agreement could be struck to pay for 1 quarter of the operating costs and receive one quarter of the harvest.
Both parties would save on operating costs, yet receive the same harvest.