> I responding to whether or not they had an "edge" in comparison to other companies which is a much weaker claim than "success".
Fair enough.
You raise some good points. I guess I just assign lower values of advantage to their investments and acquisitions than you or nl seem to do, mainly because existing companies tend to have a bad track record for breaking into established markets.
Fair enough.
You raise some good points. I guess I just assign lower values of advantage to their investments and acquisitions than you or nl seem to do, mainly because existing companies tend to have a bad track record for breaking into established markets.