We also need reproducible build to finally cover most of debian ...

leni536 · on Aug 2, 2016

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/reproducible.ht...

Isn't >80% most of Debian?

ashitlerferad · on Aug 3, 2016

80% is misleading, since there are still variations that are missing, like user shells, build paths and filesystems (disorderfs isn't used yet).

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/index_variations.html

leni536 · on Aug 3, 2016

Sure, but variations are there so the reproducible builds are more robust and can be done natively. It doesn't mean that you can't reproduce these packages, just stick to the standard build paths, filesystems, etc...

Also, I see that user login shell is varied.

rbanffy · on Aug 2, 2016

My font package is not. I am curious as to why would that be. Can you give me a hand with that?

https://github.com/rbanffy/3270font

ashitlerferad · on Aug 3, 2016

See the comments on the reproducible builds website and ask on the #debian-reproducible IRC channel on OFTC if you need more info:

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable...