I don't have enough knowledge in this area to say if the current regulations have done any good, but I'm sure there are legitimate reasons for those regulations in many cases.
But my problem isn't really with freedom in the medical field, I can support that if it really saves more lives. What I don't agree with is the way you propose to make this freedom happen. Determining who is worth saving and who is not by the amount of money they have is something I can't support, and it's what would happen with a free market approach. You say that is the only way to achieve what you want, but I don't believe so. We could increase public funding, for example.
By the way, have you looked into getting what you need from abroad?
But my problem isn't really with freedom in the medical field, I can support that if it really saves more lives. What I don't agree with is the way you propose to make this freedom happen. Determining who is worth saving and who is not by the amount of money they have is something I can't support, and it's what would happen with a free market approach. You say that is the only way to achieve what you want, but I don't believe so. We could increase public funding, for example.
By the way, have you looked into getting what you need from abroad?