Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Does an article really needs to be "fresh"? Are they tomatoes, that may become rotten?



No, I don't think so, but knowing when something was written is useful. For example, the article doesn't make mention of any other hand ciphers except for one attempt by the author. Is the lack of alternatives because none exist, or because the article was written a long time ago?


FWIW I still don't know of any good hand ciphers.


The US Army sometimes uses DRYAD. [1] It's not very good, but if you use a new code sheet every 6 hours and don't send much, it's OK.

The military views secrecy as a short-term issue. The most important secrets are "we're going to attack X at 0500 tomorrow". After tomorrow morning, it doesn't matter if the enemy can read the message. A cryptosystem only has to slow the enemy down enough that they can't react until it's too late. Classic Navy line: "Where the ship was last week is UNCLASSIFIED. Where the ship was yesterday is CONFIDENTIAL. Where the ship is now is SECRET. Where the ship will be tomorrow is TOP SECRET."

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRYAD




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: