Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Sorry, but it almost seems like some weird variation of Stockholm Syndrome that people get excited about this. It is a trivial feature that should have already been there, and was actually there over 5 years ago before they removed it. If you want to feature compare, Issues is still way behind what various other issue trackers had many years ago.



What kind of features are missing, compared to other issue trackers you like?


Although I'm not OP, I use Phabricator (https://www.phacility.com/phabricator/) at work and I absolutely love it. It's much better than Github for our use case, as it has subtasks, task merging, priorities, Kanban workboards etc. Tasks can block another task (for instance, the "Implement OAuth2" task can block the "Build a private API" task). You can flag objects for later and set specific privacy rules for every task (for instance, you can hide a security bug from the public until it's fixed). It's all tightly integrated with other Phabricator apps, which is a plus. Also, it's open source.


GitHub does sort of have subtasks. If you use checkboxes like so:

- [x] The root url displays a page

- [ ] Users can sign up, sign in, register

GitHub will display the progress on the issue (when you're looking at the list of issues) as 1 of 2.


Can you have several levels?




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: