Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This used to be Altera's "Hardcopy" advantage: an easy gate-array version of their FPGAs could (in theory) be made because: 1. the gate array uses the same gates as the FPGA, just the interconnect is customized. 2. Use Primetime compatible timing constraints for the FPGA design to begin with.



While obviously better than just the FPGA, it is still very inefficient compared to a real ASIC. Altera and Xilinx both stopped offering their programs in this area due to the fact that it as it is not really cost effective to have the same transistor level mask set and then have to buy all new masks on top once you get to sub 28nm processes.

As for primetime, we use Synopsys Synplify Pro for FPGA synthesis, and while it does a better job than Altera/Xilinx's tools, it does no where near as well (and works very differently) compared ot physical aware synthesis from Design Compiler or RC/Genus.


Primetime is just the timing checker.. where the syntax for sdc files originated I think.

We found that Synplify Pro is not quite as good as the vendor tools (xst/quartus) for FPGA synthesis, but I've not compared them recently.

Actually there used to be a version of DC for FPGAs, but it was not good at all. I think it was not as prepared to duplicate logic or flops as compared with the FPGA specific tools.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: