Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

“The Democratic National Committee remains neutral in this primary, based on our rules,” Wasserman Schultz said.

http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/dnc_chair_democratic_na...

Obviously, what the DNC says publicly and what the DNC does does not line up.




Did any of the documents release suggest that they were helping HRC _against Sanders_? Or just that they did work that would help her against a GOP candidate?


And for all we know there are also documents prepared in support of Bernie Sanders which, if leaked, would paint the parallel picture of DNC supporting him.

And that's assuming these documents are complete and unmodified. Nothing stopped this hacker from selectively editing and selectively leaking to support their agenda.

It seems relatively obvious that the DNC would have had teams preparing for both scenarios. The only difference is that Sanders has been a viable candidate for a shorter period of time.


Short answer: no, none of them.

Doesn't stop people believing that's what they say, but no - not one single thing says that.


Are there leaked documents that contradict this statement? When they're not administering primaries, the DNC spends most of their resources trying to get nominees elected in general elections. Of course they've been working on strategy for Clinton.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: