No, it's a direct criticism of lazy or sloppy writing style in which authors fail to communicate effectively.
The term has specific meaning within a specific field (not clearly identified), and has been growing rapidly (which is to say: hasn't reached a stable level of penetration) within printed material over the past decade or so.
The term has specific meaning within a specific field (not clearly identified), and has been growing rapidly (which is to say: hasn't reached a stable level of penetration) within printed material over the past decade or so.