Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You missed out the first half of my sentence:

> David Cameron passing a few laws or conducting some kind of investigation is not going to change human nature

I agree that change is possible, but it's not going to come from the top. We the people need to push for that kind of change, but half the population is too busy repeating the establishment's line that "it's all the fault of immigrants".




> not going to change human nature

I'm doing a poor job of explaining myself; it's reasoning corruption as "human nature" that I have the bigger issue with.

(I do agree that few issues are ever going to be solved with politicians' soundbites!)


How do you define corruption? (Serious question, not snarky. I suspect we are on the same side of the fence here.)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: