Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

>With such tangible business benefits, it is no wonder why Google, Amazon, and Facebook have been using microservice development practices for over a decade.

At one point Google and FB were trunk based monolithic repositories, and I haven't heard that has changed. If it has not, this might not be the best example for micro services leading to many repos.




Better examples are NetFlix and Twitter.


Are netflix and twitter trunk/monoliths? If so do you have links?


https://blog.twitter.com/2016/the-release-of-pants-10

> Today, Twitter is excited to announce participation in the first major release of the Pants open source project: 1.0.0, an open source build tool for monorepo-style source repositories.

They (for the most part) had two repos as of 11/2014. They certainly were moving towards one. Here's a public thread mentioning the two repos: science (mostly jobs, shared code) and birdcage (mostly services). https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pants-devel/60Vzkole...


Netflix is heavily based on microservices. TalkPython had a good episode with one of the higher ups at Netflix about their infrastructure if anyone is interested.

https://talkpython.fm/episodes/show/16/python-at-netflix

Transcript: https://talkpython.fm/episodes/transcript/16/python-at-netfl...


I think they meant examples of companies using microservices


Afaik Google is trunk based microservices.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: