Did anyone find peer-reviewed papers on the topic (e.g. in an IEEE journal given that it challenges the IEEE floating point standard)?
I think the book is nice, but popularizing "unum"s with a book targeting non-experts feels like skipping an important step in due process, given the grand claims that are being made.
Plenty of experts refereed the book, believe me. William Kahan, David Bailey, Gordon Bell, Horst Simon, Ulrich Kulisch, John Gunnels, and anonymous reviewers as well. It was vetted for months before it was released. If you prefer a more formal treatment, Ulrich Kulisch has written up the unum concepts in a paper more palatable to mathematicians.
Incidentally, I submitted a short version to the ARITH23 conference detailing how IEEE 754 could be repaired to give bit-identical results on different systems, and they had it reviewed by three reviewers, one who liked it, and the other two who served on the IEEE 754 committee and trashed it for some pretty silly reasons, like using the word "subnormal" instead of "denormal".
There is no easy way to boil the ocean, but I'm trying.
I think the book is nice, but popularizing "unum"s with a book targeting non-experts feels like skipping an important step in due process, given the grand claims that are being made.