The article is worth studying as a masterpiece of political rhetorics. A salesman truly shows his skills when selling a bad product.
He explains that some side issues in the debate (IPCC claims about disappearing Himalaya glaciers,FOIA violations) are mistakes and he conveniently ignores the big elephant in the room: tampering with temperature records, corruption of the peer review process, lack of evidence for AGW.
And this is all coming from the same Al Gore who used to make false claims about melting polar ice caps, increases in sea level rise, ... in his movie "An Inconvenient Truth".
To cite [1]: "You can bet he’d be making the same claim if we had a below normal snowfall records too."
He explains that some side issues in the debate (IPCC claims about disappearing Himalaya glaciers,FOIA violations) are mistakes and he conveniently ignores the big elephant in the room: tampering with temperature records, corruption of the peer review process, lack of evidence for AGW.
And this is all coming from the same Al Gore who used to make false claims about melting polar ice caps, increases in sea level rise, ... in his movie "An Inconvenient Truth".
To cite [1]: "You can bet he’d be making the same claim if we had a below normal snowfall records too."
[1] http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/02/23/the-goracle-forecast-a...