Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

C10k doesn't come up with Wikipedia because it doesn't do websockets. If it did it would probably have millions of concurrent connections, far over 10k. I dare say 10k is a bit passe. Whatsapp can apparently do 2m/server.



2m per second? These guys must have squeezed every ounce of performance out of Beam.


2m refers to concurrent connections, not rate.


Ah, that makes sense. Still, is 2m rps within the realm of possibility for BEAM with a high-end server grade processor and heavy use of actors/concurrency?


The Phoenix framework tests in October got up to 2m concurrent active (well, mostly just awake) connections, without timeouts.

http://www.phoenixframework.org/blog/the-road-to-2-million-w...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: