hmm, would you rather have a larger paycheck with dues taken out, still increasing your take home pay?
Thats whats actually on the table - wage collusion has artifically deflated wages. Unionization would fight against that artifical deflation and bring wages up closer to market value.
As long as union fees are less than the increase in your wage, why would you prefer to make less money overall just to not support a union?
a) held that overtime is due to salaried workers so, abuse your employees at your own risk,
b) held that salary collusion is illegal and fined companies millions
Also I have no desire to be forced into a union, dues forcibly taken from my paycheck, thanks.