"Lawyers earned a median salary of $114,970 in 2014, according to the BLS. The best-paid lawyers earned more than $187,199, while the lowest-paid made less than $55,400"
No idea whether everyone equates "lawyer" to "partner" in the US - certainly not the case in the UK where most qualified lawyers are not partners (except in very small firms).
I am not sure why you just quoted stats for average lawyer salaries immediately after I just said the average lawyer is not what the OP is referring to.
Lawyers does not automatically mean "partner" in the US, hence why I said "in this context". The OP is saying the majority of the 1% of income earners are things like doctors and lawyers. Not that "lawyers in general" are 1%ers.
I believe you are mischaracterising what the OP said. Take a look at what was written:
> The 1% are your small town local doctor and lawyer
Which is, I believe, demonstrably untrue. "Small town" [x] will earn less than "big city" [x] in general, and there are few elite medical facilities or high powered law firms in small towns.
This may seem like pedantry, but it's important to watch for this kind of language: the talking point that "small town doctors" are in the 1% is a powerful tool in trying to convince people that "the 1%" are just plain 'ol folk. You wouldn't want to tax good 'ol Atticus Finch, would you? I mean, he's barely getting by as it is!
If OP had said "high performing doctors and lawyers" rather than "small town doctors and lawyers," that would be a much more accurate statement which would carry a very different connotation.
http://money.usnews.com/careers/best-jobs/lawyer/salary
No idea whether everyone equates "lawyer" to "partner" in the US - certainly not the case in the UK where most qualified lawyers are not partners (except in very small firms).